Toolyt
nbfc

NBFC Funding Costs Rise Amid Surging Bank Credit Exposure

A sharp increase in the incremental share of bank credit to non-bank lenders signals a shift in funding dynamics and potential margin compression for the sector.

Published 23 September 20265 min readToolyt Pulse deskBased on reporting by ETBFSI
Chart showing growth in bank credit to NBFCs and HFCs.
Illustration: Toolyt newsroom. Indicative artwork — not a depiction of real entities or data.

Key takeaways

  • Bank credit exposure to NBFCs and HFCs has surged to 32% year-on-year in Q1FY27.
  • Incremental share of new bank credit to NBFCs tripled compared to FY25 levels.
  • Rising concentration levels and potential risk weight adjustments are driving up funding costs.
  • NBFCs must pivot toward liability diversification to mitigate margin erosion.

01

The Shift in NBFC Funding Dynamics

Non-Banking Financial Companies (NBFCs) and Housing Finance Companies (HFCs) are entering a phase of significant funding cost escalation. The primary driver is a heavy reliance on bank credit, which has seen a dramatic increase in both total volume and incremental share of new lending.

This trend indicates that lenders are hitting concentration limits within the banking system. As banks approach internal and regulatory thresholds for sector-specific exposure, the cost of incremental borrowing for NBFCs is expected to rise sharply. This shift necessitates an immediate review of credit pricing and liability management strategies to protect Net Interest Margins (NIMs).

32%

Year-on-year growth of bank loans to NBFC/HFCs in Q1FY27

27%

Growth of bank loans to NBFC/HFCs in FY26

02

Analyzing the Incremental Credit Surge

The pace at which NBFCs are consuming new bank credit has accelerated significantly over the last two fiscal cycles. Historically, the sector accounted for a modest portion of new bank disbursements, but recent data shows a fundamental change in how banks are allocating capital.

This concentration suggests that while NBFCs have successfully scaled their assets under management (AUM), the underlying liability structure has become increasingly lopsided. The reliance on bank lines, while efficient in a low-rate environment, becomes a vulnerability as interest rates remain elevated or face potential hikes.

14-15%

Incremental share of new bank credit to NBFCs in FY26/Q1FY27

5%

Incremental share of new bank credit to NBFCs in FY25

6%

Growth of bank loans to NBFC/HFCs in FY25

The tripling of incremental bank credit share highlights a critical dependency that may trigger higher risk weights and cost of funds.

Toolyt Pulse analysis

03

Impact on Net Interest Margins (NIMs)

As funding costs rise faster than the yields on advances, NBFCs will likely face margin compression. Unlike banks, which benefit from low-cost CASA (Current Account Savings Account) deposits, NBFCs are price-takers in the wholesale funding market.

Lenders operating in highly competitive segments, such as vehicle finance or prime home loans, may find it difficult to pass on these increased costs to borrowers. This pressure will likely force a strategic shift toward higher-yield segments or a more aggressive push for operational efficiency to offset the rising cost of capital.

04

Liability Diversification as a Strategic Priority

The current data suggests that the window for easy bank-led liquidity is narrowing. NBFCs and HFCs must now look toward diversifying their liability profiles to include a broader mix of capital market instruments and retail funding.

Potential avenues include the issuance of Non-Convertible Debentures (NCDs), Commercial Paper (CP), and tapping external commercial borrowings (ECB) where feasible. Diversification not only helps in managing concentration risks but also provides a buffer against sudden changes in bank lending appetites or regulatory shifts regarding risk weights.

  • Re-evaluate the mix of short-term vs long-term debt instruments.
  • Explore retail NCD issuances to reduce institutional dependency.
  • Monitor regulatory signals regarding sectoral exposure limits for banks.
  • Strengthen credit ratings to access capital markets at competitive rates.

05

Operational Implications for Lenders

Rising costs necessitate a more disciplined approach to loan origination and collections. When the cost of funds increases, the 'cost to serve' becomes a critical metric. Lenders must ensure that their field operations are optimized to prevent slippages that could further erode profitability.

Efficiency in the loan lifecycle—from lead acquisition to final collection—will distinguish resilient NBFCs from those struggling with margin pressure. Automation of manual workflows and real-time monitoring of field force productivity are no longer optional but essential for maintaining operational viability.

06

What this means for execution

For BFSI decision-makers, the surge in bank credit exposure to 32% YoY is a signal to tighten operational controls. Execution must focus on two fronts: optimizing the cost of acquisition and maximizing collection efficiency. As capital becomes more expensive, every rupee deployed must be tracked with higher precision.

Toolyt Pulse suggests that lenders will likely need to integrate their field origination and collection workflows into a single, compliance-ready platform to reduce overheads. Toolyt helps NBFCs and HFCs automate field force productivity and loan origination journeys, ensuring that even as funding costs rise, the cost of execution remains lean and transparent.

Operational excellence becomes the primary lever for margin protection when wholesale funding costs escalate.

Toolyt Pulse analysis

Answers

Frequently asked questions

Why are NBFC funding costs expected to rise?

Funding costs are rising because bank credit exposure to the sector has grown sharply to 32% YoY, reaching concentration limits. This leads to higher pricing by banks and potential regulatory risk weight increases on these loans.

How has the incremental share of bank credit changed for NBFCs?

The incremental share of new bank credit going to NBFCs jumped from approximately 5% in FY25 to between 14-15% in FY26 and Q1FY27, indicating a heavy reliance on a single funding source.

What should NBFCs do to mitigate margin pressure?

NBFCs should diversify their liability mix by accessing capital markets through NCDs and CPs, and focus on operational efficiency to lower the cost of loan origination and collections.

Editorial standards

This briefing is written by the Toolyt Pulse desk with AI assistance, based on publicly reported Indian BFSI news. Facts and figures are limited to what the cited source reports; everything else is clearly framed as analysis. We do not publish unverified numbers, forecasts presented as fact, or quotes that were not reported. Primary source: ETBFSI. Spotted something inaccurate? Write to hello@toolyt.com.

Related reading

Take action today

Start offering your field sales team a better selling experience

Sales professionals from startups to Fortune 500 companies in over 20 countries improve their productivity with Toolyt every day.